The 3 “Marketing Paradoxes” Explained (Part 1)

By Alex Mandossian on November 11, 2008

Man at Lake 2I’m glad you’re reading this 3-part series because although the three blog posts are in reverse order, I want you to review each one carefully and think about how they impact the growth of your business. 

I believe the 3 Marketing Paradoxes can have a profound impact on your business and marketing activities this upcoming year and many years to come. So it pays to re-read each post a few times to allow the message behind the message to sink in … just like they have for me.

According to Wikipedia, ”a Paradox is a true statement that leads to a contradiction or a situation which defies intuition; or, inversely, it can be a contradiction that actually expresses a non-dual truth.”

Marketing is about “changing consumer minds” through the promotion of products and services through the utilization and influences of advertising and branding.

(The term – marketing - was developed from the original meaning of “marketing” which literally referred to going to market, as in shopping, or going to a market and selling products and services).

So I’d define a Marketing Paradox as “a branding opportunity that leads to a contradiction which may defy intuition.”

Paradox #1: “The Paradox of Distribution”

If you’ve ever sold products to retail stores, you’re probably already familiar with the Paradox of Distribution.  As the term suggests:

“You can’t get adequate distribution of a product until you’ve proven it can sell; but, you can’t prove it can sell until you’ve gotten adequate distribution in the market.”  

That’s a tough pill to swallow if you make your living as manufacturer’s sales representative (as I did in the late 1980s). 

And it is because of this first marketing paradox why most mass merchant chains such as Wal-Mart, Walgreen or Target stores require truckloads of distribution support in the form newspapers, billboards, direct mail, TV and radio advertising.

Companies that sell to retailers are commonly known as the push-marketers of the marketing and distribution world.  They create their market demand; also called the “post-distribution” phase of the sales cycle.
 
In contrast, online companies and marketers are commonly known as pull -marketers because their product’s market demand is automatically created in “pre-distribution” phase of the sales cycle. 

Makese sense?  (Re-read those two paragraphs now so it’s clear in your mind).

If you’re a pull-marketer, you have less guesswork with your advertising and promotional spending (and your marketing costs are cut dramatically) because your product or service sales are actually being funded by your product or service distribution!

If you currently sell your products or services online via Internet marketing or offline via direct mail, television or radio (event QVC or HSN), then  you’re considered a direct response marketer who utilizes pull-marketing for distribution.

Key Point: If you decide to become a pull-marketer you instantly overcome the marketing obstacles hurled your way because of the Paradox of Distribution

You can also learn more about these time-proven strategies in many of the virtual trainings I teach such as Teleseminar Secrets, Podcast Secrets, Virtual Book Tour Secrets, Doubling Income Secrets, Stick Strategy Secrets.

What To Do Now: Please give me your candid comment below and tell your friends and colleagues to read this post and give me their candid comments below as well.  Sounds fair enough doesn’t it?

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

10 Responses to “The 3 “Marketing Paradoxes” Explained (Part 1)”

  1. Hello again Alex and friends,

    Another potential Key Point to consider is if
    one is caught up in the Paradox of Distribution
    and desires to be a push marketer, one way to
    create the breakthrough is to become a good pull
    marketer for your product first and create demand
    and proven buyer acceptance in your marketplace
    that then fuels the wholesale/retail channel’s
    buying engine.

    @MichaelMillman on Twitter

  2. Chris O'Byrne says:

    Per your last MOL podcast, it is extremely frustrating to start reading your feed in my feed reader then have to come back here to finish reading. Most of the time, I don’t even bother and usually I end up unsubscribing from the feed altogether.

  3. Cindy says:

    Alex, everything you say makes perfect sense. All I know is that I have in you a mentor to direct my path to the narrow road to success. If this is what you have to share from the plane going TO Bootcamp, can’t wait to see what lies ahead… !!!
    Thank you for your leadership.
    Cindy

  4. I think your dead on here. I am in this business because, simply, the paradox of distribution doesn’t affect me in any way, shape or form. I can have a teleseminar that doesn’t make me a dime and later put the product up for sale at Premiumcast.com or iTunes (or both) and see revenue/profit with just a single sale.

    The paradox of distribution gets replaced with the reality of production – until I produce something of value, I’ll never see profit from it.

    Paul

  5. mark says:

    Claude Hopkins had similar ideas in his seminal work, Scientific Advertising written 80 years ago. He talked about how he created demand of consumers by advertising in order to create demand to get the distribution channels to carry his clients material.

    best,
    Dr. Mark Zakowski

  6. Thank you Alex for all these great ideas! Your experience in Online Marketing is saving us newcomers a lot of time and heartbreak in reaching our products to the the largest markets with minimum cost.

    Nandoo

  7. Alex,

    I started using the terms “push marketing” and “pull marketing” as they relate to marketing and promoting books back in 2004. In this case, “push” relates to getting a title into the various major book distribution channels. As you point out in Part 1 of your series, that’s easier said than done. But this is one of the critical roles of a publisher. The “pull” side of the equation is the responsibility, as I see it, of the author: to pull readers to the places where their book is available. When you walk into a Barnes & Noble you are inundated with choices—too many choices, as you point out in Part 2. A third party can recommend the book (or an author can self-recommend it) making the buying decision much easier. Part 3, as it relates to book marketing, points the way forward: breaking off bits of the book and syndicating them on- and off-line.

    Thanks for this insightful series. I appreciate the clarity you give to every subject you address.

    Sincerely,
    Brian Banashak
    Publisher, Evergreen Press

  8. Dolan says:

    Very powerful. If you have a product or service and you can not only grasp this but make this transition to being a “pull-marketer”. It will transform your business.

    Great work Alex, as usual your understanding of business is enlightening!

  9. credit repair service…

    Kudo’s to the webmaster for running a great site!…

  10. Crédit Direct : de l’argent liquide immédiatement. 30′000 fr. coûtent 180 fr. par mois !

Leave a Reply